Search for: "United States v. Appling" Results 21 - 40 of 2,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  A medical facility in the United States contracts with a company headquartered in a country of concern to provide IT-related services. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States Taylor Swift is threatening legal action against the Florida college student who tracks the private jets of celebrities and public figures, including Swift. [read post]
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 10:30 am by Mario Trujillo
It became the first appellate court in the United States to review a geofence warrant. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]