Search for: "United States v. Azar" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Unknown
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (Declaratory Relief; Tribal Health Organizations)United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
McKee (Tribal Courts; Water Rights) United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Pompeo added that if Russian poisoning is the culprit, the United States will join the European Union in supporting a thorough investigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
China threatened to “take strong countermeasures” against the United States over an upcoming visit to Taiwan by Alex Azar, the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Howard Friedman
The 2020 Rule directly contravenes the Supreme Court of the United States’ recent holding in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020):  On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
Coronavirus (COVID-19) is spreading throughout the globe at an accelerating pace, with the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”) warning of an imminent outbreak in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:23 am by Simon Lester
”  Other WTO Members, including the United States, argue that the panel’s definition of an emergency is overly narrow. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]