Search for: "United States v. Bong"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:08 am
The United States Supreme Court issued five opinions this morning. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Cir. 1957); Bong Youn Choy v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 am
Kazlauskas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
The majority relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:03 am
Newsom v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
The Fifth Circuit is the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Lawyers » United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
United States, a sentencing case that was argued on Monday. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
Cir. 1957); Bong Youn Choy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
In that year alone, state and local law enforcement agencies reported 695,201 marijuana arrests, of which 87 percent were for possession only.In his judicial indictment of the war on drugs, Judge James Gray citing this statistic, remarked as follows:"Simple arithmetic yields the staggering statistic that someone is arrested for a marijuana offense somewhere in the United States every forty five seconds. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:21 pm
See “No Protection for ‘BONG HiTS 4 Jesus’” (June 25, 2007) (discussing Morse v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:25 pm
Marine--produced essentially the same lineup as last year's ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
United States about how "[t]he most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic" comes to mind. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
It does not mention color or race, but it does talk about the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Leval of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Manhattan, said in a lecture at New York University in 2005 that the Saucier decision was "a puzzling misadventure," imposing on judges "a new and mischievous rule. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
