Search for: "United States v. Brace"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm
Accordingly, the Court of International granted summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
United States, ––– U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
” The ITC’s ability to hear cases comes from a statute, that states it has the authority over “[t]he importation into the United States....of articles that—infringe a valid and enforceable United States patent or a valid and enforceable United States copyright. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 1:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 10:35 am
The case Monasky v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:45 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Brace yourself. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
When Kelly resisted by bracing herself against the door, Bowen grabbed both of Kelly’s arms, but Kelly was able to slip out of her shirt and run to her car. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm
The following blog post got me to thinking that a legal citation lesson for non-attorneys might be a challenge worth attempting, though I surely won’t get it right the first time.3 Geeks and a Law Blog: Bloomberg Law Gets Cited By A New Jersey Court… A First for “___ BL ___” (citing to United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:17 am
Finally, President Obama unveiled new curbs on racial profiling in the United States. [read post]