Search for: "United States v. Brackett"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
” See also Bridges v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Griffin v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit (based in Cincinnati, Ohio) in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Morris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
Upon returning to the United States in June 2006, he learned that his wife had committed adultery while he was away, and that his daughter developed a drug problem. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
When the injured worker resides in the United States or Canada, carriers often seek reimbursement and the direct payment of future benefits. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
As stated by the U. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Sickle v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Recently, the Defendants filed a Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, presenting the Court with the following questions: 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Claimant appealed the District Director’s lien on compensation to the United States Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
In Goins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Dutra Construction Co. (2005), the United States Supreme Court held that a vessel need only be “practically capable” of maritime transport. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:27 am
Harold Baer, United States District Judge, Southern District of New York, described in Judge Baer's opinions in Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
City of Riviera of Riviera Beach, 133 S.Ct. 735 (2013): On January 15, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Lozman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
United States, 342 F.3d 133, 142 (2d Cir.2003). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
United States, 993 F.2d 211, 213 (11th Cir. 1993) (“[I]n order to recover damages under the Jones Act, [a plaintiff] must have the status of a seaman. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:51 pm
Albert Ross Armand v. [read post]
