Search for: "United States v. Broadcast Music, Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCommunicationsCourt Exercises Authority Under Consent Decree To Set Music License Rate for TV Broadcaster Broadcast Music Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by lawmrh
United States (11-182) — the Court instead unanimously vacated and remanded 8-0, FCC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Ben
 Judges Nathan and Netburn also disagreed with Escape's argument that pre-1972 sound recordings should be excluded, with Judge Nathan citing the recent decision in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
French legislators have second thoughts on three strikes law (ArsTechnica) Russia BitTorrent admins charged in $1.25bn movie piracy case (TorrentFreak) Spain Music industry threatens OpenBitTorrent’s new hosting provider (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom BT and TalkTalk take on the Digital Economy Act (1709 Blog) Yet more lawyers jump on turn piracy into profit bandwagon (TorrentFreak) PRS wants ISPs to pay for pirating customers (TorrentFreak) United States US… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The IFPI published their downloadable Digital Music Report 2014 - which showed that music fans’ growing appetite for subscription and streaming services had helped drive recorded music revenue growth in most major music markets in 2013, with overall digital revenues growing 4.3 per cent - and Europe’s music market expanding for the first time in more than a decade. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
" Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
” Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Twelve Foreign Performing SocietiesAmicus brief of Broadcast Music, Inc.Amicus brief of Independent Music Publishers et al.Amicus brief of Ralph OmanPetitioner's reply Title: Lockwood v. [read post]