Search for: "United States v. Certain Real Property Known as Lot B"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Or what happens when a Russian company declares bankruptcy but has a lot of assets in New York real estate? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:07 pm
Attachment and garnishment -- Cook v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
It says:"Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency ...publishes, divulges, discloses, or makes known in any manner or to any extent not authorized by law any information coming to him in the course of his employment or official duties ... which information concerns or relates to the trade secrets [etc...] confidential statistical data... [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
Thomas B. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
b. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am
” Enter the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[B.] [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Yen says consumers learned; Dinwoodie says the same: “consumers in the United States have clearly become accustomed to private label practices in supermarkets. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
It’s real. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Code, §21080(b)(1).) [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
Short sales also help mortgage lenders by avoiding the costs of foreclosure, including the burden of maintaining and reselling properties acquired through the foreclosure process.Q 2. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
(Emphasis ours and we address it in dispositive section III-B of this Judgment.) [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
United Gas Pipe Line Co., 873 F.2d 1357, 1359 & n.2 (10th Cir. 1989) (following Associated General Contractors formulation; “courts may require some minimal and reasonable particularity in pleading before they allow an. . .action to proceed”); Ascon Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have,… [read post]
