Search for: "United States v. Chen" Results 21 - 40 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2008, 1:05 pm
Celebrate by watching these videos discussing recent decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States: D.C. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:51 am
In the Northern District of California case of Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Gomez (SCOTUS 1/21/16) (discussed here), the Supreme Court of the United States held that an unaccepted offer to satisfy the named plaintiff ’s individual claim does not render a putative class action moot. [read post]
Judge Chen wrote that Secretary Noem’s recission of Venezuela’s TPS designation “threatens to: inflict irreparable harm on hundreds of thousands of persons whose lives, families, and livelihoods will be severely disrupted, cost the United States billions in economic activity, and injure public health and safety in communities throughout the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:39 pm
The court stated in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:26 am
CAAF issued an interesting order in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:14 am by Florian Mueller
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion by Fortress Investment and certain entities funded by Fortress to dismiss with prejudice an antitrust complaint that Intel was still pursuing and from which Apple withdrew in June as this blog was (to the best of my knowledge) first to report.Meanwhile, a public redacted version of the order has become available (this post continues below the document):21-10-07 Public Redacted… [read post]