Search for: "United States v. Chicago"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am
In 2010, Chicago brought us McDonald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
” 15 The remaining “lesser” or “non-core” factors included the amount of skill required for the work, the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the putative employer, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. 16 The 2021 IC Rule further provided that it was “highly unlikely” that these non-core factors could outweigh the combined probative value of the core factors. 17 The Final Rule rescinds… [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
Ramirez (Loyola University of Chicago School of Law) has posted A Law & Macroeconomics Critique of San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
103 (2017), University of Chicago Law School, citing Hans v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm
First, it is focused quite directly on the law in action, suggesting that the true functional law is Lynch’s rather than that of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
For instance, while the United States and Singapore determine the COMI based on the date of the application for recognition is filed, the United Kingdom and Australia use the date of the filing of the foreign proceedings and the date of the hearing of the recognition application, respectively, as the relevant dates to determine the debtor’s COMI. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
