Search for: "United States v. Clemens"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 7:29 pm
The November 14, 2011 ruling from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the matter Purcell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
Today, the United States Court of Appeals in New York City ruled against the Republic of Argentina in the matter NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:05 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City agreed with the lower court that the confirmation of the award must also be sought in Bulgaria, not in the United States under Article V of the Convention on the Recognation and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 8:18 am
In the context of an action for the recognition of an English money judgment in the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit confirmed the preclusive effect of the Act of State doctrine. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:17 am
As reported by ESPN (and virtually every other media outlet), United States District Judge Reggie Walton of the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
City of New York, docket number 06-134, the court applied the FSIA exception of 27 USC §1605(a)(4) to rights in immovable property situated in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
Republic of Peru, docket number 11-1602, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City followed the Supreme Court and, on June 28, 2010, affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded the lower court's decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
ENC Corporation et al., docket number 04-16401, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit resolved the indispensable party issue with respect to the Republic of the Philippines, Arelma, Roxas and Golden Buddha in favor of human rights victims, confirming the Hawaiian district court decision on September 12, 2006. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Only peripherally mentioned, as an interest party, is a foreign state in the arbitration and anti-suit injunction decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 7, 2007 in the matter Karaha Bodas Co., LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:27 pm
The facts in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's unpublished decision in the matter Hilsenrath v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
By contrast, use of its police forces for such a purpose would have enabled Peru to retain immunity from suit in the United States. -- Clemens Kochinke, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Kingdom sought review of the same issue in the recognition proceeding in the United States and lost when the United States District Court applied a deferential review. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:40 am
United States, No. 09-1395. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Anne-Marie Kagy, docket number 05-7077, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decides against that claim. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:00 pm
Peterson et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:58 pm
The decision was not a close call, the court confirmed, because the Ministry had purchased American goods and acted commercially with direct effects in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 5:50 pm
The State Department's practice of offering courts a "Suggestion of Immunity" to express its views came under review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the matter Habyarimana v. [read post]
