Search for: "United States v. Congo" Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court of Justice – Labor Chamber, Embassy of the Lebanese Republic in Colombia and Embassy of the United States of America in Colombia Eloïse Glucksmann, Commisimpex v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am by Just Security
Anderson Undermines State Efforts to Hijack Immigration Enforcement by Nikhel Sus United States / Syria Deaths, Torture, and Arbitrary Detention in the Wake of the Islamic State in Syria: The US Responsibility to Act by Lauren Aarons (@LaurenAarons1), Janine Morna (@JanineMorna) and Nicolette Waldman (@nicolette_ai) United States / DRC The Democratic Republic of the Congo is in Crisis. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:29 am by Lisa
C|M|LAW faculty often co-author briefs of amicus curiae and other court documents with faculty from various institutions that are submitted in the Supreme Court of the United States and other district courts. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 2:00 pm
  Affirming, the court of appeals concluded that Congo had not used the assets "for a commercial activity in the United States" under section 1610(a) of the FSIA despite Congo's explicit waiver of immunity. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
United Kingdom, ECHR-Reports 2001-XI, p. 101, Kalegoropoulou v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am by John Jascob
Among these actions, Section 1502(b) mandated the SEC, in consultation with State, to set forth disclosure and reporting regulations for companies whose products use conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am by Larry
United States, may impact the analysis in this case. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:12 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial of Two Defendants; Declaration of Mistrial Absent Jury Poll Premature United States, appellee v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court has referred in its reasoning to the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in its Judgment on the merits in the Congo v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Letters Blogatory honors our veterans on Veteran's DayIn the case of the day, Avelar v. [read post]