Search for: "United States v. David Martin"
Results 21 - 40
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm
Thursday, January 19, 2012 Big win for Roy Black in the 11th Circuit Posted by David Oscar Markus The case is USA v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
David S. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Martin; Board of Trustees of the Judicial Form Retirement System v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
From In Custodia Legis: "A history of blasphemy laws in the United States"; "Clara Barton and the Geneva Convention. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 6:09 am
In early December, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Nestle USA Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:58 am
Attorney’s Office Southern District of Florida on July 14, 2011 released the following: “INTERNATIONAL DRUG MONEY LAUNDERING INDICTMENT UNSEALED Wifredo Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and John V. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
Gray, with David Fisher, Alabama v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
David B. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:33 pm
State v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
United States of America (C.D.Cal. [read post]
