Search for: "United States v. Department of Revenue of State of Ill." Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
As readers of this blog know, the Cato Institute will be publishing a new paper of mine on the global subsidy epidemic and how the United States could lead international reform efforts but only if we get our own subsidy (and anti-subsidy) house in order. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Illinois Secretary of State Police; Elgin, Ill., Police Department; Seymour, Ind., Police Department; and Indiana State Police provided substantial assistance. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am by Rachel Brown, Preston Lim
The United States placed Chinese tech telecom giant Huawei on the Department of Commerce’s Entity List, which threatens its access to components from U.S. suppliers. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Between the years 1973 and 2011, one hundred of nearly 2,000 Salmonella outbreaks in the United States were traced back to beef, leading to 3,684 illnesses.[1] Salmonella is omnipresent in feedlot cattle. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Maryland taxable revenues would be subject to different rates based on global annual gross revenues for the broader business, not just advertising revenues, let alone just revenues attributable to Maryland. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:58 pm
”The September 30 complaint in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:55 am by Russell Knight
Department of Revenue, 2019 IL App (1st) 182197, ¶ 26 “It is a fundamental and wholesome provision of the law which requires a trustee must act in good faith in the administration of his trust, and that requirement means that he must act honestly and with finest and undivided loyalty to his trust” Sauvage v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
Tune in next week for more ill-informed tea-leaf reading! [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]