Search for: "United States v. Donald Stevens"
Results 21 - 40
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
AdamsCase number: 13-cv-12856 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan)Case filed: July 1, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: July 19, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-71 SEC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am
According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:04 pm
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Friday heard oral arguments in Maryland Shall Issue Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Hawaii, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold President Donald Trump’s order restricting entry into the United States by nationals of seven countries, most of which have majority-Muslim populations. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:32 am
York, the challenge to President Donald Trump’s plan to exclude people living in the country without authorization from the population totals used to reapportion congressional seats among the states; and Van Buren v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:27 am
Whitford, noting that the political practice of “manipulating the boundaries of legislative districts to help one party tighten its grip on power” is “nearly as old as the United States,” “and one the Supreme Court has never curbed. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
Yesterday President Donald Trump announced new restrictions on entry into the United States by nationals from eight countries; the government has asked the Supreme Court to order briefing addressing the effect of the new order on the entry-ban case now pending before the court. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
Justice Stevens’s opinion for the Court in Matthews v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of theFourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits for-mer President Donald J. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie hopes that in Janus v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Caroline Fredrickson Look at the name of this panel—it certainly seems to sum up the predicament the United States faces in this perilous moment. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
[Professor Calabresi changes his mind based on Tillman's argument: the President is not an "Officer of the United States"] Professor Steven Calabresi wrote a letter to editors of the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
