Search for: "United States v. Ellis"
Results 21 - 40
of 383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
Ellis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
That suspect, Purvis Ellis, is the lead defendant in the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:31 am
Kopf Senior United States District Jud [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Our amicus in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:26 pm
In Ellis et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 1:47 pm
At-will employment is a foundational principle in employment law in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
Mazariegos-Rodas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
The judgement of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1382.)'" blank">U.S. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
Plaintiff, the United States of America, appeals an order of the district court granting defendant Dewayne Ellis's motion to suppress. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:58 pm
Ellis and State v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
In the court's view, the question of whether the extra-unit litigation could be charged to nonmembers lies "lies at the intersection of the" Supreme Court's decisions in Ellis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
The subject is preemption – specifically the the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
The “United States” were always referred to in the plural. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
"Cell phone users have an expectation of privacy in their cell phone location in real time and that society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable," Judge Hamilton wrote, citing an important Supreme Court decision from 1967 known as United States v. [read post]
