Search for: "United States v. Flood Building" Results 21 - 40 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 7:19 pm by admin
As we all know by now, after the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Federal Judge Robert Pitman set the table for the criminal trial of the United States vs. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:55 am by Matthew DeVries
  Let me expand my statement beyond 140 characters and give you some more information about the 1918 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:55 am by Matthew DeVries
  Let me expand my statement beyond 140 characters and give you some more information about the 1918 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Thomas/Inverse Condemnation] Congressional Delegation: ‘Our Home State Of Utah Has Repeatedly Fallen Victim To Overreaching Use Of The Antiquities Act’ [Aileen Yeung, Western Wire] “Towards a Private Flood Insurance Market” [Ike Brannon, Cato] Attorneys general of 21 states hail EPA move to rescind overreaching WOTUS (Waters of the United States) power grab [West Virginia Record, earlier] More research on how urban… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am by William S. Dodge
Notwithstanding the current lack of immunity, foreign suits against U.S. contractors do not constitute even a trickle, much less a flood. [read post]
EPA over whether wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
But most recently, the Supreme Court of the United States has halted the massive job discrimination lawsuit against mega-retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc., stating that the Plaintiffs had not shown justification for the sweeping class-action status. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by SJM
The Court also criticised the fact that residential units had been built within the boundaries of the flood plain and that construction occurred even after the 2001 flood. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The parties reached the Agreement following a procedure established by the United States Department of Agriculture’s Soil Conservation Service (“SCS”), now known as the National Resource Conservation Service, under what is referred to as P.L. 83–566 (the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, 16 U.S.C. [read post]