Search for: "United States v. Games-Perez"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
(relisted after the January 13, January 19 and February 17 conferences) Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
Consider, for example, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:19 am
I talked about one of the supposed “favors felons” cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am
United States (1994); D.C. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am
” It likewise uses “names and insignia of contemporary forces such as the National Security Agency, the United States Marine Corps, and the United States Air Force. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
PEREZ, AND REV. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Jerry KangForgotten Lessons on Race, Law, and Marriage: The Story of Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Kimberlin’s Rule 35 motions have also been denied, United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:32 am
Perez for the National Law Journal, arguing that the Voting Rights Act “has served its purpose but is now outmoded and unworkable. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
