Search for: "United States v. Gigante"
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The Ninth Circuit in Grupo Gigante held that a famous mark exception to the territoriality principle exists. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Or, consider the 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:13 am
Trump as a dangerously unstable figure and a friend of foreign despots like Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 11:13 pm
There are 333 local authorities in the UK, ranging from tiny non- existent ones like West Somerset to gigantic behemoths Like Westminster and Manchester. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, the Supreme Court read the Constitution as forbidding Congress from “commandeering” a state legislature by obligating it to enact a law. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
When President Obama recently announced that he was taking action to permit over four million undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States for two years without fear of deportation, Republicans cried foul. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:32 pm
Circuit decision, AF Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:10 am
In McCall v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm
King, a case that was then only pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
United States, 312 F.2d 418, 426 (Ct. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
Motorola Mobility appealed this order, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hold a hearing on Tuesday, September 11.The Daubert motions are all about what the FRAND royalty rate should be, not about injunctive relief per se. [read post]
