Search for: "United States v. Graham" Results 21 - 40 of 1,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:43 am by Don Geiger and Eric Gill
To prove damages at trial, Cyntec presented a market-share lost profits theory, alleging that 27 companies purchased Chilisin’s accused chokes outside the United States and then imported devices including the chokes into the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 10:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2013), the Federal Circuit held the expert “assumed that (1) the sales revenue reported in the customers’ Form 10-K reflected sales of products with molded chokes; and (2) each third-party product shipped into the United States contained an infringing choke. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:52 am by Stephen Bilkis
Garner, a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1985, had a profound impact on law enforcement procedures and civil rights in New York and across the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm by Ilya Somin
The government of the United States is a government of limited, enumerated powers. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the United States a minimal level of creativity is required. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm by INFORRM
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like – the speech of end-users. [read post]