Search for: "United States v. Hardison"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2021, 9:19 am
(Without comment, the court this week also denied a second case on the same issue, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Dalberiste v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am
In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am
Secondly, the Springer journal Climatic Change released a special issue entitled “Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, Experiences and Actions”, Volume 120, Issue 3, October 2013. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
United States (CA5 2013) (federal employee's RFRA claim could proceed even though de minimis standard foreclosed Title VII claim). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
In that case, Gerald Groff is an Evangelical Christian who worked for the United State Postal Service. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm
United States, 398 U.S. 333, 354 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Hardison, which stated that employers suffer an “undue hardship” in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise whenever doing so would require them “to bear more than a de minimis cost,” misinterprets 42 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:12 am
United States 18-370 Issue: Whether a criminal offense with a mens rea of recklessness qualifies as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
On Tuesday in Groff v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
Id. at 8 (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:41 pm
United States standard). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:13 pm
United States, involving the same issue, but ultimately decided that case on a different ground. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
” Gerald Groff was a rural mail carrier employed by the United States Postal Service (USPS). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
United States, she seeks to revisit that conclusion, arguing that because the provisions are avowedly deterrent and non-compensatory, they are subject to the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property, (in Relevance of… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am
”And in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
