Search for: "United States v. Interstate General Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court read the direct/indirect standard into the Sherman Act during the 1890s, holding in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. that general law, or what the Court now styled as "federal common law," still applied to some exclusively interstate or national questions. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
The Supreme Court granted the motion of the acting solicitor general of the United States to participate in the 65-minute oral argument on Monday. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
It also had six business units located in the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
Similarly, citing United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:33 am
The Court also invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
Shoe Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
The saga continues in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Amicus brief of the Constitutional Law ScholarsAmicus brief of Antitrust… [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
And in 2021 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
