Search for: "United States v. Janice Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
” Turning back to the Executive Branch, Silberman then suggested that it may turn out that the Justice Department would not release detainees who won release orders issued by the courts, “because no other country will accept them and they will not be released into the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600, validly stripped federal court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions filed by foreign citizens imprisoned indefinitely at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay. 2)Whether Petitioners' habeas corpus petitions, which establish that the United States government has imprisoned Petitioners for over five years, demonstrate unlawful confinement requiring the grant of habeas relief or, at least, a hearing on the… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am by John Elwood
First up is Reed v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm by Roy Ginsburg
”) Background Facts Staub, a member of the United States Army Reserve, worked at Proctor Hospital as an angiography technician. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Robert Loeb
Likewise, a court must simply accept the government’s assurance that a country accepting the detainee will not jail the detainee at behest of the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Jim Gerl
Contrast, Troy Sch Dist v KM by Janice M & Warren M 64 IDELR 303 (ED Mich 1/16/15) Court denied Honig v Doe injunction where SD did not demonstrate that maintaining student’s placement was likely to result in injury to student or others. [read post]