Search for: "United States v. Karst" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       We were eager to delve into the Federal Circuit’s recent 2-1 decision in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am by FDABlog HPM
  The MMA also amended the patent statute to provide that “courts of the United States shall, to the extent consistent with the Constitution, have subject matter jurisdiction in any action brought  . . . under [28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:54 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  Moreover, noted the Court, “Congress has given the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit exclusive appellate jurisdiction over patent cases. . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       It seems that hardly a day goes by without something new happening concerning patent settlement agreements. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm by Keith Rizzardi
United States Department of Transportation, 452 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2006)(until final approval was granted on an application, there was “insufficient certainty about the facilities’ future construction and environmental consequences to include them in the cumulative impact calculus. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:38 pm by David Strifling
In one high-profile case pending in the United States Supreme Court, the state of Mississippi claims that Memphis, Tennessee is pumping groundwater so heavily that a depression in the water table has formed and is altering the regional flow of groundwater. [read post]