Search for: "United States v. Legg"
Results 21 - 25
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:59 am
If the interested person seeks the prior option, the agency must refer the request to the applicable United States Attorney, who then files a complaint for forfeiture in federal district court, per 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
