Search for: "United States v. London"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,899
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
State Auto. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:39 pm
Embassy London & Consulates in the United Kingdom The U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Khan (2022) EWCA Civ 831 contained no suggestion that a money claim might amount to waiver, and Cussens v Realreed Limited (2013) EWHC 1229 suggested that an action for damages (other than non-payment of service charges) could equally found a s.146 notice as well as a declaration of breach. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am
The outcome will likely have a lasting impact on the strategic considerations of parties engaged in or contemplating arbitration, reinforcing or reshaping the dynamics of dispute resolution in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
Starting at 1:30 PM GMT (London) / 8:30 AM ET (New York). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
Q v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
In case you missed it, Freedom of Speech in International Law, published by Oxford University Press, was launched on January 18, 2024, at an event at King’s College London, United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
