Search for: "United States v. Marcotte"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., UNITED PHOSPHORUS, INC. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:40 pm
Assuming the Administration follows appropriate procedures to adopt the rules, most legal commentators do not expect the legal challenges opposing the mandate orders to be successful in the courts particularly after the Supreme Court refused to overturn or hear arguments for overturning a unanimous decision of a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Klassen v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Taking time to make changes needed to identify and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
In Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down DOMA’s prohibition of the recognition of same-sex couples as married or spouses as an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
” If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
In T-Mobile v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
About The Author A practicing attorney and Managing Shareholder of Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, P.C, Cynthia Marcotte Stamer’s more than 30 years’ of leading edge work as an practicing attorney, author, lecturer and industry and policy thought leader have resulted in her recognition as a “Top” attorney in employee benefits, labor and employment and health care law. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV), vacating certain portions of 45 C.F.R. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:25 am
In its complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
UMMC’s breach notification disclosed that UMMC’s privacy officer had discovered a password-protected laptop containing ePHI of thousands of UMMC patients missing from UMMC’s Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am
About The Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER™ Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: Erisa & Employee Benefits,” “Health… [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]
