Search for: "United States v. Mason" Results 21 - 40 of 563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
United States, the Court held that using sense-enhancing technology to obtain information about the interior of a home, even without a physical intrusion, constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, at least if the technology is not "in general public use. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
The Masons contend the statute violates the guarantees of equalprotection of the laws found in the constitutions of the United States andGeorgia. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Warley, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisville residential segregation law, one of a wave of such laws spreading through the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract: Racial zoning laws spread rapidly through the United States starting in 1910. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, 736 F.3d 1192 (9th Cir. 2013), petition filed, No. 13-1124 (March 17, 2014), urges the Supreme Court of the United States to overrule Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:50 pm by The Federalist Society
The Supreme Court therefore affirmed the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm by The Federalist Society
In an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that (1) Lexmark exhausted its patent rights in toner cartridges sold in the United States through its "Return Program"; and (2) Lexmark cannot sue Impression Products for patent infringement with respect to cartridges Lexmark sold abroad, which Impression Products acquired from purchasers and imported into the United States, because an authorized sale outside the United States,… [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:23 am by Jamison Koehler
Court of Appeals dealt with a twist on the bolstering issue in Andre Mason v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:34 am by Amanda Frost
United States (1996), and the more recently decided Arizona v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
O'Donnell has responded that he would be willing to plead to a misdemeanor and pay a large fine, however, representatives of the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of California have stated that they would require O'Donnell to plead guilty to a felony. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Mocsary (United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit) have posted ‘This Right is Not Allowed by Governments that are Afraid of the People’: The Public Meaning of the Second Amendment When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified (George Mason Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 823-862, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]