Search for: "United States v. Mb" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegalNever Too Late 263 [Week ending May 3] The CJEU (again) on 3D trademarks: the Gömböc judgment | The non-systematic relevance of earlier IP rights: from Gömböc to Brompton Bicycle | Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt's favour) | SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement | Is COVID-19 a Nietzschean moment for… [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm by Iantha Haight
The American Dreams app for iPhone and iPod Touch is a portable library of primary source documents and audio files related to United States and North American history. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:08 am
In a decision released today, the United States Supreme Court includes video as part of its decision. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:36 am by FHH Law
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
In these conjoined appeals the appellants challenged decisions upholding the secretary of state’s refusal to grant them indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm by Rosalind English
This formula refers to an “irreducible minimum” of information to be given to an appellant in a series of control orders made under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (“the 2005 Act”), most recently Secretary of State for the Home Department –v- MB [2007] UKHL 46; , and Secretary of State for the Home Department –v- AF (No. 3) [2009] UKHL 28; [2009] 3 WLR 74. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 Put another way, how much illness in the United States is caused by foodborne pathogens? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:47 am by Chad W. Johnson
Shaw hired subcontractors to perform the construction work, including United Builders Services and MB Roofing (collectively “Subcontractors”). [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-392Issue: (1) Whether, in the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to a judicial campaign, the McCormick v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:23 am
Byrne discussed the United States Fair Housing Act and a recent decision regarding its application to 'companion animals'. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
IndyMac MBS, Inc. 13-640Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]