Search for: "United States v. Mohammad"
Results 21 - 40
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 8:37 am
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the intermediate military appellate court responsible for reviewing military commission proceedings, announced that it currently lacks a quorum to decide contested motions in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:14 am
§ 2241 to deny the detainees imprisoned at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay their right to meaningful habeas corpus hearings. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm
I believe, if my sources are correct, that this is United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:58 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:00 am
Tomorrow morning, in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For its argument, the Bush administration relies on a post-invasion Security Council Resolution on the reconstruction of Iraq, as well as a 1948 SCOTUS case, called Hirota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Hodges: The Continuing Battle Over Equal Rights for Sexual Minorities in the United States, (GenIUS, December 2015, at 18).Philip T. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:47 pm
Accordingly, the Court held that the challenged provisions of the ordinance were unconstitutionally vague under the United States and New Jersey Constitutions, as applied to “churches. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 6:29 am
That judge read recent Supreme Court precedents differently, saying "the one constant in all these cases is that the petitioners were in the custody of the United States alone, in its capacity as the United States, and not by any multinational force. [read post]
