Search for: "United States v. Montoya" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 12:14 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Hernandez v Pena, --- F.3d ---, 2016 WL 1719955 (5th Cir.,2016) six-year-old D.A.P.G. was abducted from his home in Honduras and brought illegally into the United States by his mother Reina Leticia Garcia Peña. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
 As the opinion explains, [a]ccording to the Complaint, Defendant drove his automobile from Mexico to the United States Port of Entry in Calexico, California. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
Later that day, at around 6:00 p.m., he was released from the hospital and transported back to the airport.Upon returning to the airport, Molina was released by CBP and allowed to enter the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 8:19 pm by Charles Kotuby
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, however, overturned that decision. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:41 am by Amy Howe
  On the one hand, they could agree with Diana Montoya Alvarez, the mother in the case, that the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction only gave Manuel Lozano, the child’s father, one year to file a lawsuit in the United States seeking his daughter’s automatic return to the United Kingdom – even if he couldn’t find her before that one-year period expired. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
When Lauren Moskowitz, the attorney for Diana Montoya Alvarez, stood up this morning to argue on behalf of the respondent in the international family law dispute Lozano v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]