Search for: "United States v. Moss"
Results 21 - 40
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
The trustees (the Trustees) alleged that Reem Plumbing and Reem Contracting were contractually obligated to contribute to certain union benefit funds (the Funds), as required by four collective bargaining agreements between the Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York and Local Union No. 1 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada (id.). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Challenges of FinTech June 14, 2022 | Jillian Moss Scholar sketches the current regulatory landscape for financial technologies in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
Among the tens of thousands of tattooers working in the United States, the tiny handful who have brought copyright infringement claims are rare outliers. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:26 am
The Court in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
In its May 2022 ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Here’s a breather from headlines about the recent leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that overturns Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
Since then, rulemaking has typically addressed consumer-protection concerns, the authority for which was codified in Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act in 1975, incorporated in Section 18 of the FTC Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
In Branch v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Given the United States’ well-documented (and sordid) experience with public-utility regulation, that’s probably not a good idea. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
In order, they were Judges Mehta; Moss; James E. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
Bank National Association v Moss, 186 AD3d 1753, 1753 [2d Dept 2020]; State v Winkle, 179 AD3d 1121, 1126 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
This bifurcated system leads to a curious dynamic in United States patent law, namely between (i) patent infringement (as a question of fact) and (ii) claim construction (as a question of law or a mixed question of fact and law) decided by a judge. [read post]