Search for: "United States v. Mueller" Results 21 - 40 of 601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 12:54 am by Florian Mueller
The question of whether Sony maintains a monopoly in the Japanese market (if one adopts its own preferred market definition of "high-performance videogame consoles") came up in the United States Senate:There's nothing surprising about a United States Senator from Washington state (#Xbox) raising the issue of #Sony's monopoly maintenance & exclusive dealing.If there was an #antitrust problem in the Japanese ice cream market,… [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Quinta Jurecic, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
As if to calm the itchy fingers of a million Twitter pundits, the brief emphasizes that “[t]he United States does not express any view regarding the potential criminal liability of any person for the events of January 6, 2021, or acts connected with those events. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson mmWave trial: Apple dropped one of its three patents-in-suit right before trialFor the same day--yesterday--the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) had scheduled the trial of Apple's countersuit against Ericsson. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:52 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” “[E]very person in the United States will be the jury in this case,” Fishwick said, “and they will need to have confidence that the prosecution team reflects all of them. [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]