Search for: "United States v. National Discount Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
” The United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
” Nor would enforcing Kroma EU’s interest interfere with the sovereignty of another nation, which generally occurs “where the parties are engaged in parallel litigation within the foreign nation or where the foreign nation takes action against the interest which the plaintiff seeks to assert in the United States court. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
[27] One main factor of consideration is whether or not the foreign manufacturer has assigned United States trademark rights and their registration to the designated exclusive United States importer.[28] United States and international antitrust and free competition policies intersect with trademark law in that the designated United States importer is usually concerned with gray market goods because they are sold for less,… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
KeySpan Corporation (CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶50,975).In addition, the Division filed civil antitrust lawsuits against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and (together with seven states) against American Express, MasterCard, and Visa.In the first suit, the Division challenged “most-favored nations” (MFN) clauses in Blue Cross’s agreements with hospitals that allegedly limit the discounts the hospitals can offer to Blue Cross’s… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
’” Id. at *4 (quoting Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d at 1074; quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 5:00 pm
Union Carbide, 370 U.S. 690 (1962) and United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
UHS of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:30 am
This argument was denied because "inactive corporations remain citizens of their state of incorporation. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm
Stoyas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
Congress had enacted a statute that prohibited any corporation from assisting immigrants in entering the United States to perform labor. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
DVD Format/LOGO Licensing Corporation (TTABlog) Why the paperwork is important – District Court E D Michigan judgment in CLT Logistics v River West Brands (Property, intangible) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition to LIFE FOR THE LIVING over LIFE INSURANCE FOR LIVING, rejects genericness and abandonment counterclaims: Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
