Search for: "United States v. Nettl"
Results 21 - 22
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
This broad issue came before the United States Supreme Court in McKune v Lile, 536 US 24 (2002), which also involved the consequences of a sex offender not confessing guilt. [read post]
