Search for: "United States v. Obey" Results 21 - 40 of 611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
The Supremacy Clause only requires the states (and others) to obey federal law. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by Todd Janzen
Today the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm by Micah Belden
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:10 am
Yesterday, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]