Search for: "United States v. One Package of Merchandise"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:13 am
It has plants in the United States, and one in Mexico. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:15 am
One such case is XYZ Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
One may also consider filing for a state trademark registration as a means of protection. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
[1] McLeod v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
These products are larger containers or packages of a product that typically it has offered to customers at a cost savings per unit. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Quality King’s standard purchase order included representations by FDI that “any and all merchandise that is the subject of this purchase order (1) was obtained by Supplier [FDI] without fraud, misrepresentation or violation of any statute, regulation, or administrative court order, (2) can lawfully be distributed in the United States in its present form and packaging, and (3) is not the subject of any legal or contractual restriction on its… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:03 am
United States, 516 F.3d 1340, 1346 (Fed.Cir.2008)... [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:31 pm
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
The trademark owner will simultaneously receive information (including, under specified circumstances, samples) concerning the merchandise or, if applicable, its retail packaging. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:50 pm
"The unsealed indictment reveals that both Markell and Olson, who were antiquities dealers, were charged with one count of conspiracy to "knowingly enter and introduce into the commerce of the United States imported merchandise, namely, Burmese and Khmer antiquities, by means of materiallyfalse declarations and statements" and three counts of false statements concerning the entry of goods into the U.S.It should be recalled… [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
HD is the registered owner of the SCREAMIN’ EAGLE trademark for clothing in the United States and other countries but does not have such a registration in Canada. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:14 am
Moore had multiple opportunities to settle this case, but he believes that as an artist in the United States, he should have the right to paint subjects that are meaningful to him. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
