Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Property" Results 21 - 40 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
Relying on the “functional test” set forth in a line of cases distinguishing discretionary decisions from ministerial ones (e.g., Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880 Real parties filed for approvals to construct three homes on contiguous parcels in the Berkeley hills. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]