Search for: "United States v. Pleasants" Results 21 - 40 of 216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
While the conservative champions of the law may see that as precisely the goal, it would likely cause platforms to become less pleasant and welcoming to users. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
Why then did Judge Bundy ignore clear caselaw from the Supreme Court of the United States to rule that Dick’s sign violated the local obscenity ordinance? [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm by Josh Blackman
" He said, "Taney is making the case that Black people who were enslaved were never part of the people of the United States and could never be citizens. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am by Justice Goodwin Liu
Having now, as a judge myself, experienced disagreement over matters far less consequential than the presidency of the United States, I have even more regard for how she navigated that challenging period. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by Rohit De
Kashmir, was a semi-autonomous princely state in 1947 operating outside of colonial law, soon to be drawn into a long drawn out international conflict between India and Pakistan with successive emergency regimes in both Indian and Pakistani administered Kashmir. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
” As applied to older technologies, the rule contemplates that a tracking device may be a mechanical tool used to track the movement of a tangible object., like the beeper attached to a container of chloroform in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Josh Blackman
United States – which is used "in service of the constitutional rule" that Congress cannot delegate legislative power to the executive branch. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
A political subdivision, on the other hand, is a subordinate unit of government created by the State to carry out delegated governmental functions. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]