Search for: "United States v. Prelogar"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SG Prelogar said in response, longstanding and hitherto unquestioned precedent has recognized the sovereign interest of the United States to sue states for injunctive relief to enforce the supremacy of federal law. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
Today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
United States (2023) Fischer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The United States solicitor general represents the federal government before the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar's argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
In his brief in the Supreme Court, Percoco stresses that the court of appeals’ decision upholding his conviction relied on that court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 3:02 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:33 am
Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States Hon. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to decide whether Congress waived the United States’ sovereign immunity from lawsuits for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argues for the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm
Texas, when newly minted Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar pushed back against questions by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch (as well as others), who wanted to characterize the cause of action and relief sought by the United States as unprecedented. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Those harms to which the state plaintiffs pointed in Dep't of Commerce--"diminishment of political representation, loss of federal funds, degradation of census data, and diversion of resources" away from Democratic-leaning political units and towards Republican-leaning ones--were the reason for the citizenship question. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
“If the United States may sue any State or state official who expresses a contested view of the Constitution, then law professors, state lawyers, and all government officials have cause for serious concern. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm
The Department of Justice filed the second case, United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
