Search for: "United States v. Quality Medical Consultants, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
(IP Osgoode) United States US General IP outsourcing threatens national interest? [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146 (1981). [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Cook Medical LLC, No. 16-127 (SCA Redux); Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
The project consists of two care units, cottages, and a clubhouse on 20 acres, and was part of a larger development area including a local medical center, a senior assisted living facility, medical office buildings and a local retail shopping center. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
New Relists Zappos.com, Inc., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Fage Dairy Processing Industry (TTABlog) Precedential No. 23: Sophistication of buyers leads to TTAB dismissal of CALYPSO section 2(d) opposition and cancellation proceeding: Calypso Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Sandra Shines v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione… [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
While Janssen Pharmaceutical and Johnson & Johnson can be held liable for the damages caused by Risperdal and Invega, a 2011 decision by the United States Supreme Court protects most makers of generic risperidone/paloperidone from litigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
