Search for: "United States v. Russell Wolf"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
” At his Harmless Error blog, Luke Rioux discusses last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” Looking ahead to next week, Thomas Wolf at the Brennan Center for Justice offers “five things to get you up to speed” on Benisek v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
United States, the Court is considering whether the “recommendation” of a government attorney is intangible property that can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the Hobbs Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
United States,] the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision blessing internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in Tharpe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
