Search for: "United States v. Samuels"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
That's contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
“Our decision returns the issue of abortion to those legislative bodies,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito, author of the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
(The Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for federal courts, recently announced a new policy intended to crack down on this type of “judge-shopping. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
” Representing the United States, Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
One is the expansion of state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
" And as Justice Brennan described our system in his opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” As More described England, the United States also is “planted thick with laws, from coast to coast. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
Justice Samuel Alito wrote an opinion respecting the denial in which he said that the lower court’s decision “exemplifies the danger that I anticipated in Obergefell v. [read post]
