Search for: "United States v. Serafin"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am
United States Just Security had a piece “Lawsuit against Fox News Over Coronavirus Coverage: Can It Succeed? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Recent Judgments and Orders The order of the Court of Appeal in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz is now available [pdf]. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Philippine The Press Gazette had an article “Filipino government shuts down major news network during pandemic” United States A Pennsylvania hobby company filed a defamation lawsuit accusing Mattel, Rubik’s Brand, Velcro and four other companies of falsely claiming it sold counterfeit products, causing Amazon.com to remove it from its online platform. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
United States Alec Baldwin’s defamation lawsuit has been given the green light to head to trial. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
United States Don Blankenship, the former chief of Massey Energy who unsuccessfully attempted to run for Senate in West Virginia two years ago, has received the green light to proceed in a defamation suit that blames a number of individuals and media organizations for his political loss. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
United States Tulsi Gabbard, a U.S. congresswoman from Hawaii, dropped a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, according to a court filing. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the operation of the section 4 defence in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 852. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
