Search for: "United States v. Siegel" Results 21 - 40 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract:In deciding Meredith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Kurt Lash, guest-blogging
Cooter and Siegel, for example, believe that a Resolution VI-based reading of Article I, Section 8 support revisiting the analysis in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The paper builds on Siegel 1984 to argue that, by indicating in Smyth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
” By contrast, she observed that her favorite decisions were United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:56 am by Steven Cohen
  The defendant filed a motion to exclude, which was granted by the court Facts:  This case (Siegel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am by David Kopel
United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917) (Congress can use the interstate commerce power to criminalize interstate travel by people intending to engage in non-commercial extra-marital sex); Champion v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 1:18 pm by Steven Cohen
New York Presbyterian Hospital et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – August 5th, 2019) involves alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Administrative Code of the City of New York, and New York state laws. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a result, on April 24, 2023, in a telephone call between Sebco and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the latter indicted that [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Siegel, Yale Law SchoolJoint Program:  Engendering Equality:  A Conversation with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, and New Voices in Legal History, 1:30 – 3:15 p.m.This Section on Legal History and Women in Legal Education Joint Program, co-sponsored by the Section on Constitutional Law, explores the history of women’s equality and the legacy of Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:54 am by Christopher Mathews
One of the challenges faced by the defense trial team in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by Ronald Mann
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]