Search for: "United States v. Smart" Results 21 - 40 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am by Nicole Saharsky
United States, No. 09-1227, a case about a woman who attempted to poison a romantic rival with toxic chemicals and (appropriately) was charged with a serious crime. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Among other provisions, the new statute adopts rules promulgated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), a U.N. body that has long been concerned with promoting the enforceability of arbitration agreements and electronic contracts in its member countries. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by lpcprof
Reagan Seidler, Law Society of Upper Canada, Smart & Biggar, has published The Law of Haunted Houses: A Comment on Stigmatized Properties following Wang v Shao 54 (2) UBC Law Rev. 455 (2021). [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 2:58 pm by lpcprof
ICYMI: Reagan Seidler, Law Society of Upper Canada, Smart & Biggar, has published The Law of Haunted Houses: A Comment on Stigmatized Properties following Wang v Shao at 54 (4) UBC Law Rev 455 (2021). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:57 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm by Kristen Matteucci
Updated regularly, this database provides an overview of over 60 “of the most-asked about and controversial legal topics in the United States” in chart format. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
At least that is the person I heard when I read your 1973 article and who materialized at the Convention.So, as an advocate for child sex abuse victims across the United States, I ask you—what will you do as President of the United States about child sex abuse to stem the pain, to increase justice, and to ultimately reduce this billion-dollar burden on our healthcare system? [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes observes that although, “[a]s smart as they are, Supreme Court justices sometimes falter when they predict the consequences of their decisions,” Justice Antonin Scalia’s predictions on same-sex marriage – made in his dissent in United States v. [read post]