Search for: "United States v. Spitzer" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2006, 10:41 pm
Not wanting to waste a good rant, I feel compelled to follow up Saturday's screed about the posting by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors of Watters v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm by Stephen Halbrook
"  To determine how "neutral" those experts are, I'll focus on Robert Spitzer, who has a Ph.D. in political science and is a professor emeritus at the State University of New York. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm by Brian J. Brislen
  Rather,  “only those actions by the claimant which have the purpose and effect of causing the United States to pay out money it is not obligated to pay, or those actions which intentionally deprive the United States of money it is lawfully due, are properly considered ‘claims’ within the meaning of the FCA. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Adelphia Defendants Denied New Trial; Claim That Chief Witness' Testimony Was Perjured Is Rejected United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about whether employee stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Of course, in 1967, the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated all state laws against interracial marriages, so now they would be routinely recognized. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]