Search for: "United States v. Stanford"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
, 48 Stanford Law Review 113 (1995-1996). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
As we read the brief, the Amars have retreated from the central position they put forward in an influential 1995 Stanford Law Review article. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
Even in the United States, we have over 2 million people who do not have running water in their homes. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
From In Custodia Legis: "A history of blasphemy laws in the United States"; "Clara Barton and the Geneva Convention. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School podcast, Stanford Legal, co-host Pam Karlan discussed the national abortion rights landscape after Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
“In August 1981, President Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor to the Supreme Court of the United States,” Roberts said. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Whenever I teach the federalism portion of my first-year constitutional law course, at least one cynical (but clever) student observes that the juxtaposition between United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 5:37 am
In Grigson v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
