Search for: "United States v. State of NC" Results 21 - 40 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 4:04 am by Mack Sperling
This means that claims for violations of NC’s TSPA cannot be pursued (at least in the NC Business Court) for misappropriation occurring outside of the State. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:27 am by Carolina Attorneys
United States content likely falls within the Brady Rule, but not all Brady materials are Giglio disclosures. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:03 am by Ted Frank
I'll be discussing the United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:23 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In the United States Supreme Court unanimous decision in Packingham v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
" The Waldburger decision imperiled toxic tort lawsuits that were filed against the United States on behalf of many plaintiffs who alleged that the drinking water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina was contaminated. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am by Jacob Wirz
In the amicus brief, which was filed with the United States Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]