Search for: "United States v. State of Or. Water Resources Dept."
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
Dept. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
SALT WATER DISPOSAL, CO., INC. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
” Plaintiffs Alaska Oil and Gas Association (“AOGA”), the State of Alaska, and North Slope Borough (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska challenging the listing decision. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
’” (Citing Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
She escaped to the United States and sought asylum. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
