Search for: "United States v. Two Obscene Books"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, constitutional adjudication does not work that way. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
The first of these two cases is Bantam Books v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
The first of these two cases is Bantam Books v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:15 am
And while the United States Attorney doesn’t bother to cite the statutes he was convicted of violating, it would appear that the core charges relate to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
While the recent dispute with Epic Games has highlighted the economic dimension of this system (Epic objects to paying a 30 percent commission to Apple for transactions related to its game Fortnite), there are many historic examples of pure content-based restrictions on Apple's part: Apple rejected a dictionary because it contained obscene words. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
California (1959) ("For if the bookseller is criminally liable [for obscenity] without knowledge of the contents, and the [anti-obscenity] ordinance fulfills its purpose, he will tend to restrict the books he sells to those he has inspected; and thus the State will have imposed a restriction upon the distribution of constitutionally protected as well as obscene literature. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am
One of the fascinating questions raised by the United States Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Given the current climate, hate speech prosecutions will probably become more common in the United States soon. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Kingsley Books, Inc. v. [read post]
